Dealer Reinsurance
An arrangement in which a dealer-owned company assumes the insurance risk on the F&I products (service contracts, GAP, etc.) the dealership sells, so the dealer, rather than a third-party provider, keeps the underwriting profit and investment income.
Why it matters: It converts F&I from a flat-commission revenue line into an owned asset that compounds over time — the core wealth-building idea behind the entire site.
Related: Underwriting Profit · Profit Participation · CFC · DOWC
CFC (Controlled Foreign Corporation)
A foreign corporation more than 50% owned by U.S. shareholders. In dealer reinsurance, the dealer typically forms a small reinsurance company offshore (e.g., Turks & Caicos, Nevis). Depending on the facts, it may elect under §953(d) to be taxed as a U.S. company and, if it separately qualifies, make an §831(b) election — neither election is automatic.
Why it matters: A common entry structure for dealers — it can capture underwriting profit, while the availability and effect of the §953(d)/§831(b) elections depend on ownership, domicile, premium levels, and how the program is structured.
Related: 953Election · 831Election · NCFC · DOWC · Super CFC
Super CFC
An industry label for an enhanced CFC-style structure that uses retail (rather than net) cost accounting, intended to generate larger deductions and net operating losses in the early years and potentially defer more tax than a standard CFC. Actual treatment depends on the accounting method, structure, and applicable law.
Why it matters: It is marketed as offering more scale and deferral than a basic CFC without the full capital and compliance burden of a DOWC. Whether those benefits are realized is fact-specific and warrants qualified tax advice.
Related: CFC · DOWC · 831Election
NCFC (Non-Controlled Foreign Corporation)
A foreign reinsurance company in which U.S. shareholders own 50% or less, so it is generally not a "controlled" foreign corporation and may be subject to different tax rules than a CFC. Dealers typically participate alongside others, which can reduce capital requirements and administrative burden.
Why it matters: Often a lower-capital entry point for smaller or single-point stores seeking profit participation without standing up a fully owned captive. The tax and control trade-offs versus a CFC depend on ownership and applicable law.
Related: CFC · Profit Participation · Quota Share
DOWC (Dealer-Owned Warranty Company)
A domestic (U.S.) company the dealer owns outright that issues its own F&I contracts as the obligor, retaining the premium, underwriting profit, and retail margin. It is generally taxed as a regular U.S. C corporation rather than under §831(b).
Why it matters: Maximum control and economics, but it requires the most capital and compliance infrastructure — best suited to high-volume dealers and groups.
Related: Obligor · Underwriting Profit · Super CFC · CFC
Retro (Retrospective Program)
A profit-sharing arrangement in which the dealer receives a retrospective payment based on the actual claims experience of their book of F&I business, without forming a separate captive entity.
Why it matters: The simplest way to share in underwriting results — easy to start, but with less wealth-building upside and fewer tax-planning options than a CFC or DOWC.
Related: Profit Participation · Loss Ratio · Reserve Release
831(b) Election
A U.S. tax election under Internal Revenue Code §831(b) that can let a qualifying small insurance company with net written premiums under an annual limit (indexed for inflation) be taxed only on its investment income rather than its underwriting income. Qualification is fact-specific and requires, among other things, genuine risk distribution and risk transfer — it is not automatic, and not every captive qualifies.
Why it matters: It is often cited as a key tax feature of dealer reinsurance, but the IRS actively scrutinizes abusive "micro-captive" arrangements. Whether the election is available and respected depends on the specific facts, real risk, and proper administration; qualified tax and legal advice is essential.
Related: 953Election · Risk Distribution · Risk Transfer · CFC · Underwriting Profit
Reference: IRS — Abusive tax shelters & micro-captive transactions
953(d) Election
An IRC §953(d) election that allows an eligible foreign insurance company (such as a dealer’s offshore CFC) to elect to be treated as a U.S. taxpayer, so it is taxed domestically. It may then be positioned to make an §831(b) election if it separately qualifies.
Why it matters: It is often the bridge that lets an offshore CFC access U.S. tax treatment, but eligibility and effect depend on the entity’s facts and applicable law — it does not by itself guarantee any particular tax result.
Related: CFC · 831Election
Underwriting Profit
What remains from earned premium after paying claims and expenses. If a book of F&I contracts collects more premium than it pays out in claims and costs, the difference is underwriting profit.
Why it matters: It is the profit dealer reinsurance is designed to capture — the money that otherwise stays with a third-party provider.
Related: Earned Premium · Loss Ratio · Combined Ratio · Investment Income
Investment Income
The return earned on reserves and capital held inside the reinsurance company while it waits to pay claims.
Why it matters: A second layer of return on top of underwriting profit; over a multi-year horizon it becomes a meaningful part of accumulated wealth.
Related: Reserve · Underwriting Profit
Loss Ratio
Claims paid divided by earned premium, expressed as a percentage. A 40% loss ratio means 40 cents of every earned premium dollar went to claims.
Why it matters: The single most important measure of a reinsurance program’s profitability — lower loss ratios mean more underwriting profit for the dealer.
Related: Combined Ratio · Underwriting Profit · Claims Reserve
Combined Ratio
The loss ratio plus the expense ratio — total claims and expenses divided by earned premium. Below 100% indicates an underwriting profit; above 100% an underwriting loss.
Why it matters: A fuller picture of profitability than loss ratio alone, because it includes administrative and acquisition costs.
Related: Loss Ratio · Underwriting Profit
Profit Participation
The dealer’s share of the underwriting results of the F&I products they sell, whether through a retro payment, an NCFC, or a fully owned captive.
Why it matters: The umbrella concept for how dealers "participate" in profits they used to give away — the degree of participation rises from retro to CFC to DOWC.
Related: Retro · NCFC · CFC · DOWC
Premium
The price the customer pays for an F&I product (a service contract, GAP policy, etc.). Part of it funds claims reserves; part covers administration and commissions.
Why it matters: Premium is the raw input to a reinsurance program — where it flows, and how much reaches the dealer’s captive, determines the economics.
Related: Earned Premium · Unearned Premium · Reserve · Ceding Commission
Reserve
Funds set aside by the reinsurance company to pay future claims on contracts already in force.
Why it matters: Reserves are both a liability (claims may come) and an asset base (they earn investment income until claims are paid).
Related: Claims Reserve · Reserve Release · Investment Income · Unearned Premium
Reserve Release
The point at which reserves held for a block of contracts are freed up — because the contracts expired or claims came in lower than reserved — and any surplus may be recognized as profit. When and whether that surplus is actually accessible to the dealer depends on the structure, domicile, and program agreement.
Why it matters: It is often when dealers actually "see" accumulated underwriting profit, so understanding the timing — and any restrictions on access — is central to cash-flow planning. Reserve access is not guaranteed and varies by program.
Related: Reserve · Underwriting Profit · Earned Premium
Claims Reserve
The portion of reserves specifically estimated to cover claims that have been incurred or are expected on in-force contracts.
Why it matters: Adequate claims reserves are what make a program solvent and credible; under-reserving overstates profit and creates risk.
Related: Reserve · Loss Ratio
Ceding Commission
A fee paid to the party that "cedes" (transfers) business into the reinsurance company — often the administrator or fronting carrier — to cover acquisition and administrative costs.
Why it matters: Ceding commissions and other layered fees are where program economics quietly erode; transparency about them is a recurring theme on this site.
Related: Administrator · Fronting Carrier · Premium
Risk Distribution
Spreading insurance risk across a large enough pool of independent exposures that the law of large numbers applies, so losses become statistically predictable.
Why it matters: It is a legal requirement for a captive to be treated as real insurance (and to qualify for 831(b)); without it, the IRS may disallow the tax treatment.
Related: Risk Transfer · 831Election · Quota Share
Risk Transfer
The genuine shifting of the possibility of loss from the insured to the insurer. Real money must be at risk for a captive to be respected as insurance.
Why it matters: Together with risk distribution, it separates legitimate reinsurance from a mere savings account with an insurance label.
Related: Risk Distribution · 831Election
Administrator
The company (a TPA — third-party administrator) that administers the F&I product: pricing, claims adjudication, regulatory filings, and reporting.
Why it matters: A reinsurance program is only as good as the products and administration behind it; the administrator’s pricing and claims discipline drive loss ratios.
Related: Obligor · Ceding Commission · Fronting Carrier
Obligor
The party legally obligated to perform under an F&I contract — i.e., to pay covered claims. Depending on the structure this is the administrator, an insurer, or (in a DOWC) the dealer’s own company.
Why it matters: Who the obligor is determines who ultimately carries the risk and keeps the profit — a defining difference between structures.
Related: DOWC · Administrator
Earned Premium
The portion of a contract’s premium that corresponds to coverage already provided as time elapses. A 60-month contract earns its premium gradually over 60 months.
Why it matters: Profit is measured against earned (not written) premium, so earning patterns shape when underwriting profit is recognized.
Related: Unearned Premium · Loss Ratio · Reserve Release
Unearned Premium
The portion of premium for coverage not yet provided — held in reserve because the contract could still produce claims or be cancelled for a refund.
Why it matters: Unearned premium is a liability on the books; it is why early "profit" can be illusory until contracts season.
Related: Earned Premium · Reserve
F&I Products
The finance-and-insurance products sold in the dealership business office: vehicle service contracts, GAP, tire & wheel, appearance protection, and similar coverages.
Why it matters: These products generate the premium and underwriting profit that a reinsurance program captures.
Related: Vehicle Service Contract · GAP · Tire & Wheel · Ancillary Product · Premium
GAP (Guaranteed Asset Protection)
A product that covers the "gap" between what a customer owes on a vehicle and what their auto insurance pays if the vehicle is totaled or stolen.
Why it matters: A common, high-penetration F&I product — though its loss volatility means some structures treat it cautiously in a reinsurance book.
Related: F&I Products · Loss Ratio
Vehicle Service Contract (VSC)
A contract that pays for covered mechanical repairs after (or alongside) the manufacturer’s warranty — often called an extended warranty, though technically it is a service contract.
Why it matters: Usually the largest and most stable premium source in an F&I book, and therefore the backbone of most reinsurance programs.
Related: F&I Products · Obligor · Loss Ratio
Tire & Wheel
A protection product that covers repair or replacement of tires and wheels damaged by road hazards.
Why it matters: A popular ancillary product with generally predictable claims — a useful diversifier in a reinsurance portfolio.
Related: F&I Products · Ancillary Product
Ancillary Product
Smaller F&I protection products beyond the core VSC and GAP — key replacement, dent/ding, windshield, theft protection, and similar coverages.
Why it matters: Ancillaries add premium and can improve overall program economics when their loss ratios are favorable.
Related: F&I Products · Tire & Wheel
Quota Share
A form of reinsurance in which the reinsurer takes a fixed percentage of every policy’s premium and pays the same percentage of every claim.
Why it matters: A common way dealer captives participate — proportional sharing keeps incentives aligned and helps satisfy risk-distribution requirements.
Related: Treaty · Risk Distribution · Profit Participation
Treaty
The reinsurance agreement that defines how risk and premium are shared between the ceding party and the reinsurer — the terms, percentages, and obligations.
Why it matters: The treaty is the contract that governs the whole arrangement; its terms determine the dealer’s economics and protections.
Related: Quota Share · Ceding Commission
Fronting Carrier
A licensed insurance company that issues the policies and then cedes the risk to the dealer’s reinsurance company, allowing the captive to operate without holding admitted-insurer licenses in every state.
Why it matters: Fronting makes many dealer structures possible, but the fronting fee is another cost layer to understand and price.
Related: Administrator · Ceding Commission · Treaty
Captive (Insurance Company)
An insurance company created and owned to insure the risks of its owner (here, the dealer’s F&I products) rather than the general public.
Why it matters: A dealer reinsurance company is a captive; the term is shorthand for the owned entity that captures underwriting profit.
Related: Dealer Reinsurance · CFC · DOWC · 831Election